Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Archive Power Systems, Inc. v. Ryncorp, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Archive Power Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Shane Grant and Ryncorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Grant Prideco, L.P. v. HDD Rotary Sales, LLC et al
as 4:2009cv02721
Plaintiff:
Grant Prideco, L.P.
Defendant:
HDD Rotary Sales, LLC and Superior DrillPipe Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Design Originals, Inc. et al v. Summer Chase LLC et al
as 4:2009cv02191
Plaintiff:
Design Originals, Inc., Design Originals, Inc. and Design Originals, Inc.
Defendant:
Summer Chase LLC, TimCo Enterprises, Inc., Timothy Winston Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
PAM International Inc v. Kam Coach LLC et al
as 4:2007cv00426
Plaintiff:
PAM International Inc
Defendant:
Kam Coach LLC, Terry L James, Kersh Risk Management Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
US Synthetic Corp v. ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al
as 6:2007cv00269
Plaintiff:
US Synthetic Corp
Defendant:
ReedHycalog UK, Ltd., ReedHycalog, LP and Grant Prideco Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al v. United Diamond Drilling Services, Inc et al
as 6:2007cv00251
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner
Counter Defendant:
ReedHycalog UK, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
ReedHycalog, LP and Grant Prideco, Inc
Counter Claimant:
United Diamond Drilling Services, Inc and Varel International Ind, L.P.
Defendant:
Ulterra Drilling Technologies, L.P., Diamond Oil Well Drilling Company, Inc., DOWDCO Bits LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
W.D. Armstrong Corp v. Lamb et al
as 2:2007cv00010
Plaintiff:
W.D. Armstrong Corp
Defendant:
Grant Lamb, Carol Lamb and Lamb's Super Appliance World, Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
