Cases 11 - 20 of 28
VENICE PI, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-10
as 2:2017cv03322
Plaintiff:
VENICE PI, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
HEADHUNTER, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-10
as 2:2017cv02985
Plaintiff:
HEADHUNTER, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
PHYSICIANS RECOMMENDED NUTRICEUTICALS, LLC v. LUNOVUS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01935
Plaintiff:
PHYSICIANS RECOMMENDED NUTRICEUTICALS, LLC
Defendant:
LUNOVUS, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-10
as 2:2017cv01618
Plaintiff:
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Fine Line Homes, L.P. et al v. Beiler et al
as 4:2015cv01565
Plaintiff:
Fine Line Homes, L.P. and Fine Line Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Dave Beiler, Lisa A. Edinger, Sonja P. LaForm and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
LUKOIL NORTH AMERICA, LLC v. ATLANTIS PETROLEUM, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02104
Plaintiff:
LUKOIL NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Defendant:
ATLANTIS PETROLEUM, LLC , KENNETH C. MORRISON , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
STREAMLIGHT, INC. v. WEAPON BLENDER AIRSOFT et al
as 2:2014cv04580
Plaintiff:
STREAMLIGHT, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, AIRSOFT WHOLESALERS, INC., REGAL LOGISTICS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JUST KIDSTUFF, INC. v. SNIPSNAP APP LCC et al
as 5:2013cv05983
Plaintiff:
JUST KIDSTUFF, INC.
Defendant:
SNIPSNAP APP LCC and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PATRICK COLLINS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-10
as 5:2012cv06829
Plaintiff:
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DAVISON DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SLADE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00895
Plaintiff:
DAVISON DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant:
SLADE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, MICHAEL SLADE and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
