Cases 11 - 20 of 24
RCRV Inc v. Adam Tala Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00550
Defendant:
Adam Tala Inc, John and Jane Does, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and others
Plaintiff:
RCRV Inc
RCRV, Inc. v. Iramys Ojeda et al
as 2:2014cv07688
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Iramys Ojeda, David Ponton and others
Plaintiff:
RCRV, Inc.
Sweet People Apparel, Inc. et al v. Watch L.A. Jeans & Sportswear et al
as 2:2014cv07399
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Pierre D. Mitri, Watch L.A. Jeans & Sportswear and others
Plaintiff:
RCRV, Inc. and Sweet People Apparel, Inc.
Sweet People Apparel, Inc. et al v. Watch L.A. Jeans & Sportswear et al
as 8:2014cv01534
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-10, Pierre D. Mitri, Watch L.A. Jeans & Sportswear and others
Plaintiff:
RCRV, Inc. and Sweet People Apparel, Inc.
Sweet People Apparel, Inc. v. Freehug Apparel Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04790
Defendant:
Freehug Apparel Inc, John and Jane Does and XYZ Companies
Plaintiff:
Sweet People Apparel, Inc.
Sweet People Apparel, Inc. v. DesignFusion Corp
as 2:2014cv03881
Defendant:
Design Fusion U.S.A., Designfusion Corp, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Sweet People Apparel, Inc.
Sweet People Apparel, Inc. et al v. Vault Denim et al
as 2:2013cv08959
Plaintiff:
Deodar Brands, LLC, RCRV, Inc. and Sweet People Apparel, Inc.
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Vault Denim and XYZ Companies
Sweet People Apparel, Inc. et al v. Jean Jacket Clothing et al
as 2:2013cv07716
Defendant:
Jean Jacket Clothing, Inc., John and Jane Does, Kamyar Penhasi and others
Plaintiff:
RCRV, Inc. and Sweet People Apparel, Inc.
Knick Knack, Inc v. Joe Nguyen et al
as 8:2013cv00859
Defendant:
Bluepointpromo, Inc, John and Jane Does, Joe Nguyen and others
Plaintiff:
Knick Knack, Inc
Sweet People Apparel Inc et al v. Cool-G Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02142
Defendant:
Cool-G Inc, John and Jane Does and XYZ Companies
Plaintiff:
RCRV Inc and Sweet People Apparel Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
