Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Oppenheimer v. Pamal Broadcasting, Ltd.
as 3:2015cv30177
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Pamal Broadcasting, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Montani et al v. Dibonaventura
as 4:2015cv13453
Plaintiff:
Mark Montani and Italian Choppers, LLC
Defendant:
David Dibonaventura
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Cengage Learning, Inc. et al v. Hunting et al
as 1:2015cv13135
Plaintiff:
Cengage Learning, Inc. , McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC and Pearson Education, Inc.
Defendant:
Eric Hunting, David Toone, Michael Blalock and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. Keville et al
as 1:2015cv13009
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
David Keville, Daniel Crosby and Country Saloon Products, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Clark Company, Inc. v. Bang & Olufsen America, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv30088
Plaintiff:
David Clark Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Bang & Olufsen America, Inc. and Bang & Olufsen A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
David Clark Company, Inc. v. Bang & Olufsen America, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv30088
Plaintiff:
David Clark Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Bang & Olufsen America, Inc. and Bang & Olufsen A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Phillips v. Macy's, Inc.
as 1:2015cv10059
Plaintiff:
David Phillips
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer et al v. POP Entertainment, LLC
as 1:2014cv14332
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer and Performance Impressions, LLC
Defendant:
POP Entertainment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer et al v. WhoFish Media, Inc.
as 1:2014cv14329
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer and Performance Impressions, LLC
Defendant:
WhoFish Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. David J. Rooney
as 1:2014cv12302
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Sony/ATV Songs LLC , Fall Out Boy, Inc. and others
Defendant:
David J. Rooney
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
