Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Isaaenko v. University of Minnesota et al
as 0:2013cv03605
Plaintiff:
Olga Issaenko
Defendant:
University of Minnesota , Martina Bazzaro , Regents of the University of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
John v. Maingate, Inc.
as 0:2013cv01875
Plaintiff:
David John
Defendant:
Maingate, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Maingate, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
David John
Anytime Fitness, LLC v. Nevada Fitness Holdings, LLC et al
as 0:2012cv02779
Plaintiff:
Anytime Fitness, LLC
Defendant:
Nevada Fitness Holdings, LLC and David Ezra
Microsoft Corporation v. Materials Processing Corporation et al
as 0:2012cv00705
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Materials Processing Corporation and David Kutoff
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Buffalo Wild Wings International, Inc. v. Grand Canyon Equity Partners, LLC et al
as 0:2011cv03287
Plaintiff:
Buffalo Wild Wings International, Inc.
Defendant:
Grand Canyon Equity Partners, LLC , GCEP-Goodyear, LLC , GCEP-Surprise, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Walsh Bishop Associates, Inc. v. O'Brien et al
as 0:2011cv02673
Plaintiff:
Walsh Bishop Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Keith O'Brien , Ian Scott , David Serrano and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Haag Engineering Company v. Schimelpfenig et al
as 0:2011cv01964
Plaintiff:
Haag Engineering Company
Defendant:
David Schimelpfenig and Shiny Penny, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Koch Group Mpls, LLC et al
as 0:2011cv00495
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , MJ Publishing Trust , Rondor Music International, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Koch Group Mpls, LLC, David H. Koch and Scott M. Kotaska
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
John v. Maingate, Inc.
as 0:2010cv04902
Plaintiff:
David John
Defendant:
Maingate, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Maingate, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
David John
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
