Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. In Your Ear, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv05030
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
In Your Ear, LLC, Becky Ann Evans, John David Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
APT Group Inc. v. Monster Moto, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00546
Plaintiff:
Apt Group Inc.
Defendant:
Monster Moto, LLC, Olen Rice, Robert A. Rice, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
PBI-Gordon Corporation v. National Chemical Laboratories of PA, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00274
Plaintiff:
PBI-Gordon Corporation
Defendant:
National Chemical Laboratories of PA, Inc., NCL John Does 1 - 50, Source Supply, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Purzel Video GMBH v. John Doe
as 4:2013cv01670
Plaintiff:
Purzel Video GMBH
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Purzel Video GMBH v. John Doe Subscriber Utilizing IP Address 99.63.5.25
as 4:2013cv01668
Plaintiff:
Purzel Video GMBH
Defendant:
John Doe Subscriber Utilizing IP Address 99.63.5.25
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
United Pet Group, Inc. v. John Doe
as 4:2013cv01053
Plaintiff:
United Pet Group, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Bayou Pictures, LLC v. John Does
as 4:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
Bayou Pictures, LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-11
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Riding Films, Inc. v. John Does 1-11
as 4:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
Riding Films, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-11
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Pearson Education, Inc. v. Doe et al
as 4:2013cv00239
Plaintiff:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe Nos. 1-5, Leni King and Mark King
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
United Pet Group, Inc. v. John Doe(s)
as 4:2012cv02009
Plaintiff:
United Pet Group, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
