Intellectual Property Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 171
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-13
as 2:2017cv00572
Plaintiff: ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-13
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
COOK PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. JOHN DOES
as 2:2016cv06532
Plaintiff: COOK PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant: JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-8
as 2:2016cv06138
Plaintiff: ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-8
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
SIMIO, LLC v. FLEXSIM SOFTWARE PRODUCTS, INC.
as 2:2016cv01710
Plaintiff: SIMIO, LLC
Defendant: FLEXSIM SOFTWARE PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CRIMINAL PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-5
as 2:2016cv04467
Plaintiff: CRIMINAL PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
WESTMORELAND ADVANCED MATERIALS, INC. v. ALLIED MINERAL PRODUCTS INC.
as 2:2016cv00604
Plaintiff: WESTMORELAND ADVANCED MATERIALS, INC.
Defendant: ALLIED MINERAL PRODUCTS INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
WESTMORELAND ADVANCED MATERIALS, INC. v. ALLIED MINERAL PRODUCTS, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00263
Plaintiff: WESTMORELAND ADVANCED MATERIALS, INC.
Defendant: ALLIED MINERAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ESSICK AIR PRODUCTS, INC. v. BIOZONE SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2015cv03654
Plaintiff: ESSICK AIR PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant: BIOZONE SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC. v. EV PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00393
Plaintiff: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.
Defendant: EV PRODUCTS INC. , KROMEK LIMITED , KROMEK GROUP PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
GOOD MAN PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. DOE
as 2:2015cv00809
Plaintiff: GOOD MAN PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?