Cases 51 - 60 of 771
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Applied Concepts, Inc. v. MPH Industries, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Applied Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
MPH Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
7D Holdings, LLC v. Jawk Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
7D Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Jawk Holdings LLC and GenRev Labs LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
7D Holdings, LLC v. Jawk Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
7D Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Jawk Holdings LLC and GenRev Labs LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Tapestry, Inc. et al v. Rigdon et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Tapestry, Inc., Coach Services, Inc. and Kate Spade, LLC
Defendant:
Jo Ann Sanders Rigdon, Sheri E. Sanders Smith, The Pink Daisy Market, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Warren Communications News, Inc. v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Warren Communications News, Inc.
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Feit Electric Company, Inc. v. Ledvance, LLC
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Feit Electric Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Ledvance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
