Cases 61 - 70 of 82
Eisai R & D Management Co., Ltd. v. Honorable David J. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01138
Plaintiff:
Eisai R & D Management Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Honorable David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Pfizer, Inc. et al v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01131
Plaintiff:
Pfizer, Inc. and Wyeth Holdings Corporation
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01090
Plaintiff:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
President and Fellows of Harvard College et al v. Kappos et al
as 1:2012cv01034
Plaintiff:
President and Fellows of Harvard College and E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company
Defendant:
David J. Kappos and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv00886
Plaintiff:
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Deca-Medics, Inc. v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv00738
Plaintiff:
Deca-Medics, Inc.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154
NetAirus Systems LLC v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv00709
Plaintiff:
NetAirus Systems LLC
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 146
BTG International Ltd. v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv00682
Plaintiff:
BTG International Ltd.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Human Genome Sciences, Inc. v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
Human Genome Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Exelixis, Inc. v. Lee
as 1:2012cv00574
Plaintiff:
Exelixis, Inc.
Defendant:
Honorable David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
