Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Wild v. Innova Supply Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
Alexander Wild
Defendant:
Innova Supply Inc. and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Satterwhite v. Chive Media Group, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00095
Defendant:
Chive Media Group, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Alan Vance Satterwhite
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Chapman v. Facilium Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv03322
Plaintiff:
Carl Chapman
Defendant:
Facilium Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lazy One Inc v. Azula Technology Co Ltd et al
as 3:2017cv02968
Plaintiff:
Lazy One Inc
Defendant:
Azula Technology Co Ltd, Guangzhou Azula Network Technology Co Ltd, Supersun Ye and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wild v. Wager et al
as 4:2017cv02606
Plaintiff:
Alexander Wild
Defendant:
Robert Wager and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Nordic Clinical Inc v. Health Research Laboratories LLC et al
as 3:2016cv03290
Defendant:
Health Research Laboratories LLC , Kramer Duhon and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Nordic Clinical Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Just Bulbs v. Ricks
as 4:2014cv03672
Plaintiff:
Bulbs 4 East Side, Inc.
Defendant:
Gregory Ricks and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Hana Modz, LLC v. Dailey Vape Steals et al
as 4:2014cv00365
Petitioner:
Hana Modz, LLC
Defendant:
Dailey Vape Steals and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Orient Watch Co., Ltd v. Time Center et al
as 4:2013cv03628
Plaintiff:
Orient Watch Co., Ltd
Defendant:
Time Center, Mehboob Khemani, Laila Khemani and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
InvenSense, Inc. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00405
Plaintiff:
InvenSense, Inc.
Defendant:
STMicroelectronics, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
