Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cozy Comfort Company LLC v. Davie Clothing Proprietary Limited et al
as 2:2021cv00310
Defendant:
Bedabox LLC and Davie Clothing Proprietary Limited
Plaintiff:
Cozy Comfort Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ziff Davis LLC v. O'Brien
as 2:2019cv01458
Defendant:
Dustin O'Brien
Plaintiff:
Ziff Davis LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Pohl v. Agave Dentistry LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01037
Defendant:
Agave Dentistry LLC and Tyson Davis
Plaintiff:
Mitchell A Pohl
Intervenor:
ProfessionalPlanets.com, LLC
Thirdparty_defendant:
Whitehall Management Services, Inc., iDent, LLC and Mitchell A Pohl
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
ProfessionalPlanets.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Wet-Media Incorporated v. Davis
as 4:2014cv01972
Plaintiff:
Wet-Media Incorporated
Defendant:
Colin Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Budget Blinds Incorporated v. Davis et al
as 2:2013cv01699
Plaintiff:
Budget Blinds Incorporated
Defendant:
John Davis, Lindy Davis, Expert Window Covering of Northern Arizona LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Patriot Ordnance Factory Incorporated et al v. Advanced Device Design Incorporated et al
as 2:2012cv01858
Plaintiff:
Patriot Ordnance Factory Incorporated and Frank DeSomma
Defendant:
Advanced Device Design Incorporated, Robert B Davies, Robert Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
AllChem Performance Products Incorporated v. Aqualine Warehouse LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01520
Plaintiff:
AllChem Performance Products Incorporated
Defendant:
Aqualine Warehouse LLC, Cactus Valley Pool Services and Repairs LLC, Chad Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Neuromechanical Innovations, LLC v. Kiro Kids Pty Limited, et al
as 2:2010cv01068
Plaintiff:
Neuromechanical Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Kiro Kids Pty Limited and Neil J Davies
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
