Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bayco Products, Inc. v. LB Marketing, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Bayco Products, Inc.
Defendant:
LB Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Bayco Products, Inc. v. ProTorch Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00648
Defendant:
Hong Huang, Tim Goetz & Associates LLC, Suzhou ProTorch Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Bayco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bayco Products Inc v. Cutting Edge Products Inc
as 3:2014cv01243
Plaintiff:
Bayco Products Inc
Defendant:
Cutting Edge Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Bayco Products Inc v. Philips Intellectual Property & Standards et al
as 3:2013cv00880
Plaintiff:
Bayco Products Inc
Defendant:
Philips Intellectual Property & Standards and US Philips Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bayco Products Inc v. Coleman Cable Inc
as 3:2012cv01099
Plaintiff:
Bayco Products Inc
Defendant:
Coleman Cable Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bayco Products Inc v. OnScene Solutions, LLC
as 3:2011cv03228
Plaintiff:
Bayco Products Inc
Defendant:
OnScene Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Bayco Products Inc v. Lucent Ace Manfacturing, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01854
Plaintiff:
Bayco Products Inc
Defendant:
Lucent Ace Manfacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Bayco Products Inc v. Hi-Way Distributing Corporation of America
as 3:2011cv01799
Plaintiff:
Bayco Products Inc
Defendant:
Hi-Way Distributing Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Case name not on file
as 4:2010cv00871
Plaintiff:
Bayco Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Brian Quittner and QuiqLite, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Promote Innovation LLC v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00424
Plaintiff:
Promote Innovation LLC
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Homer TLC, Inc. and Bayco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
