Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Patent Armory, Inc. v. California Tortilla Group, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01469
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory, Inc.
Defendant:
California Tortilla
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Express Companies, Inc. v. Innovative Life Solutions, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02301
Plaintiff:
Express Companies, Inc. a California corporation doing business as American CPR Training
Defendant:
Innovative Life Solutions, Inc., Innovative Day, LLC, Curtis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Craftshack, Inc. v. Retail Services and Systems, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02750
Plaintiff:
Craftshack, Inc.
Defendant:
Retail Services and Systems, Inc. a Maryland Corporation, individually doing business as Total Wine and More, California Fine Wine and Spirits, LLC a California Limited Liability Company, individually doing business as Total Wine and More and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Stemcells, Inc. et al v. Neuralstem, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv02664
Plaintiff:
StemCells, Inc., Stemcells California, Inc. and Stemcells California, Inc.
Defendant:
Neuralstem, Inc., Neuralstem, Inc., Neuralstem, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Neuralstem, Inc. v. StemCells, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv01172
Plaintiff:
Neuralstem, Inc.
Defendant:
StemCells, Inc., Stemcells California, Inc. and Neurospheres Holding, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Neuralstem, Inc. v. StemCells, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv01173
Plaintiff:
Neuralstem, Inc. and Neuralstem, Inc.
Defendant:
StemCells, Inc., Stemcells California, Inc. and Neurospheres Holding, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Neuralstem, Inc. v. StemCells, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv01171
Plaintiff:
Neuralstem, Inc.
Defendant:
StemCells, Inc., Stemcells California, Inc. and Neurospheres Holding, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
