Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. Atomic Dog, LLC et al (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Atomic Dog, LLC and Atomic Dog LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Goade v. Bowtech, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00330
Defendant:
Bowtech, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniel Goade
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Goade v. Parker Compound Bows, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01067
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniel Goade
Defendant:
Parker Compound Bows, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lenny's Franchise Systems, LLC v. Solem et al
as 2:2014cv02627
Plaintiff:
Lenny's Franchise Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Solem , Joshua N. Anderson , Mr. Apple, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. J&M Concepts, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01156
Plaintiff:
Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
J&M Concepts, LLC and Popcorn Sutton Distilling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Boogey, Inc. v. Lite Cycle, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00291
Defendant:
Lite Cycle, Inc., Daniel Goracoff and Marc Silverman
Plaintiff:
Boogey, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Castronuovo v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00428
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Daniel Castronuovo
Defendant:
Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, INC., Sony BMG Music Entertainment (US Latin), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Czech v. Coggin et al
as 3:2010cv00159
Plaintiff:
Melissa Fuller Czech
Defendant:
Daniel Coggin and John and Jane Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Chanel, Inc. v. Stanton et al
as 2:2009cv02111
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Harold Stanton, Jr., Danielle Stanton and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Herzog et al v. Sinclair et al
as 1:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
Joyce Herzog, Joyce Herzog, Joyce Herzog and others
Defendant:
Daniel Sinclair and Joyceherzog.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
