Cases 1 - 9 of 9
VALENTINE-SHABAZZ v. SINACOLA et al
as 2:2022cv03342
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE-SHABAZZ
Defendant:
NICHOLAS SINACOLA, BRITTANY PEETCHATKA, REGINALD JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
SANI-PRODUCTS PEST CONTROL, LLC et al v. DAVIES et al
as 2:2020cv01414
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF ROBERT E. DAVIES WITH CO-EXECUTORS PAMELA McCAREY and ERNEST SIMON and SANI-PRODUCTS PEST CONTROL, LLC
Defendant:
SANI-PRODUCTS WORLDWIDE INC and DEVIN L. DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
DAVIS v. AMERICAN BRIDGE COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00952
Defendant:
AMERICAN BRIDGE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
HAROLD DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
C. RAYMOND DAVIS & SONS, INC. v. WORTHINGTON DAVIS ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03491
Plaintiff:
C. RAYMOND DAVIS & SONS, INC.
Defendant:
WORTHINGTON DAVIS ASSOCIATES, LLC, MARK DAVIS, MARK WORTHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MCMAHON v. REFRESH DENTAL ALLIANCE et al
as 2:2016cv00170
Plaintiff:
SUSAN MCMAHON
Defendant:
REFRESH DENTAL ALLIANCE , PROFESSIONAL DENTAL ALLIANCE, LLC. , NORTH AMERICAN DENTAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Wise et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2010cv02094
Plaintiff:
Richard Wise , Richard Reitter , Joshua Maloney and others
Defendant:
Haley Williams, Josh Farro, Taylor York and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
JOHNS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2010cv00590
Plaintiff:
MARK JOHNS
Defendant:
JEFF DAVIS, MICHAEL STEVENSON, DECAYDANCE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Microsoft Corporation v. Davis
as 1:2009cv02024
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Harold Davis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
WOODLARK CIRCLE, INC. et al v. STRYKER CORPORATION et al
as 5:2008cv01372
Plaintiff:
WOODLARK CIRCLE, INC. and D.T. DAVIS ENTERPRISES, LTD.
Defendant:
STRYKER CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
