Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BELMORA LLC v. AMERICAN PRIVATE LABEL PRODUCTS, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv15365
Defendant:
ANA WOOD, JOHN DOES 1 - 50, AMERICAN PRIVATE LABEL PRODUCTS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BELMORA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
JUUL LABS, INC. V. JUUL MONSTER, LLP, ET ALS
as 2:2019cv06399
Defendant:
K & R Products, LLP, Kristen Vanorski, Status Distribution LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
JUUL LABS, INC. v. 4X PODS et al
as 2:2018cv15444
Defendant:
GREGORY GRISHAYEV, JOHN DOES 1-50, 4X PODS and others
Plaintiff:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
HELMER, CONLEY & KASSELMAN, P.A. et al v. HARK AND HARK et al
as 1:2018cv10927
Plaintiff:
HELMER, CONLEY & KASSELMAN, P.A., YARON HELMER and JAMES M. CONLEY
Defendant:
JEFFREY HARK, HARK AND HARK, JOHN DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. et al v. TECH DATA RESELLER LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2018cv00880
Defendant:
TECH DATA RESELLER LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, NCOM LIMITED, RAMAZAN TURK and others
Plaintiff:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. and CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. et al v. UMIT INTERNATIONAL TRADING LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00883
Plaintiff:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. and CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Defendant:
UMIT INTERNATIONAL TRADING LLC, BEYIN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LLC, BRYANT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
MAID IN HOBOKEN, LLC v. M.I.M.C. JANITORIAL, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
MAID IN HOBOKEN, LLC
Defendant:
M.I.M.C. JANITORIAL, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-50, ABC COMPANIES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
SPY PHONE LABS LLC. v. GOOGLE INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06565
Plaintiff:
SPY PHONE LABS LLC.
Defendant:
GOOGLE INC. and JOHN DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
PATRICK COLLINS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-50
as 2:2012cv05815
Plaintiff:
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
