Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. v. J.M.J. Bagel Delicatessen, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03617
Plaintiff:
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. and Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.
Defendant:
J.M.J. Bagel Delicatessen, Inc. doing business as Gabbys Gourmet Bagelatessen
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. v. J.M.J. Bagel Delicatessen, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03617
Plaintiff:
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. and Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.
Defendant:
J.M.J. Bagel Delicatessen, Inc. doing business as Gabbys Gourmet Bagelatessen
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Van Derham et al v. Bullseye Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00490
Defendant:
Daniel Brennan and Bullseye Restaurant, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mariana Davalos, Cielo Jean Gibson, Gabby Jean Saucedo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Skinner et al v. Review Entertainment Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv07148
Plaintiff:
Jessica Burciaga, Paola Canas, Jaime Edmondson and others
Defendant:
Dennis Conway, Asumoh U. Enyiema and Review Entertainment Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Burciaga et al v. C.J. NYC Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06181
Plaintiff:
Jessica Burciaga, Alana Campos, Paola Canas and others
Defendant:
C.J. NYC Inc. and Lisa Ann Piazza
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Milo & Gabby, LLC et al v. Amazon.com, Inc
as 2:2013cv01932
Plaintiff:
Milo & Gabby, LLC and Karen Keller
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2013cv05941
Plaintiff:
Milo & Gabby, LLC and Karen Keller
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
The Dinex Group, LLC v. Duquin et al
as 1:2012cv02767
Plaintiff:
The Dinex Group, LLC
Defendant:
Pat Duquin and Gabby Alfieri
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
