Cases 1 - 7 of 7
La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream Parlor Corp v. Windy City Paletas, et al
as 3:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream Parlor Corp, a California Corporation and La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream Parlor Corp
Defendant:
Windy City Paletas, Inc., Ecuamex Paletas, Inc., a California Corporation, Sky Limit Enterprises II, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream Parlor Corp, a California Corporation v. Windy City Paletas, a California Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream Parlor Corp, a California Corporation
Defendant:
Windy City Paletas, a California Corporation, Ecuamex Paletas, Inc., a California Corporation, Sky Limit Enterprise, Inc., a California Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. JARAMILLO et al
as 2:2020cv01568
Defendant:
DIANA M JARAMILLO and MR PAN RESTAURANT & BAKERY CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Monster Energy Company v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv08727
Plaintiff:
Monster Energy Company
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhen Dong Li, Zhang Ye and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
CHANEL, INC. v. ADAMS DANIELLE et al
as 0:2017cv61127
Plaintiff:
CHANEL, INC.
Defendant:
ADAMS DANIELLE, AIN ROA, Alana Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
JMAS Enterprises Inc et al v. Kassir Import-Export Co Inc et al
as 2:2011cv06258
Plaintiff:
JMAS Enterprises Inc and PHD Marketing Inc
Defendant:
Ross Jaramillo, John Does, Ziad G Kassir and others
Guishan, Inc. et al v. Faith Ice, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02407
Plaintiff:
Guishan, Inc. and Mister Softee, Inc.
Defendant:
Faith Ice, Inc., Petes Ice Cream Truck Rental Corp., Tommy Dalageorgos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
