Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Richardson El v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2023cv03198
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Richardson El
Defendant:
Mikell Scarborough d/b/a Charleston County/County of Charleston Master in Equity, Kristin Graziano d/b/a Charleston County/ County of Charleston Sheriff, John Kay d/b/a Hutchens Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Richardson El v. Hutchens Law Firm et al
as 2:2022cv02964
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Richardson El
Defendant:
Hutchens Law Firm, Mikell Scarborough, Kristin Graziano and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Stipkala & Klosowski LLC v. Thrive Law & Consulting LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01829
Plaintiff:
Stipkala & Klosowski LLC doing business as Thrive IP
Defendant:
Thrive Law & Consulting LLC and Katherine Corinne Bischoff
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Perkins Law Firm LLC v. Emergent Law PC
as 6:2019cv03508
Plaintiff:
Perkins Law Firm LLC
Defendant:
Emergent Law PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Amcol Systems, Inc. v. Lemberg Law, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv03422
Plaintiff:
Amcol Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Lemberg Law, LLC and Sergei Lemberg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Van Romer et al v. McNair Law Firm PA et al
as 6:2011cv00787
Plaintiff:
Edward W Van Romer and Basic Concepts Inc
Defendant:
McNair Law Firm PA and Cort Flint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Palmer v. Advent Product Development Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00832
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Palmer
Defendant:
Advent Product Development Inc, Advent Product Development Inc, Triad Resource Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pappalardo v. Advent Product Development Inc et al
as 2:2007cv01326
Plaintiff:
Alfred Pappalardo
Consol Plaintiff:
Vernon Prioleau
Defendant:
Advent Product Development Inc, Richard Goldstein and Goldstein Law Offices PC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
