Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Baker v. Ni et al
as 3:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Brad Allen Baker
Defendant:
Hao Ni and Neal Massand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Neal Technologies Inc v. Larson Electronics LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00611
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Robert Bresnahan and Larson Electronics LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Reliq Health Technologies, Inc. v. Neal et al
as 4:2019cv00040
Plaintiff:
Reliq Health Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
AccuHealth Technologies, LLC, Shelby Neal, Stephen Samson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Neal Technologies, Inc. v. Innovative Performance Research, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Innovative Performance Research, LLC and Vince Au
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Neal Technologies, Inc. v. Innovative Performance Research, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00746
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Innovative Performance Research, LLC and Vince Au
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Neal Technologies, Inc. v. Fireproof LLC
as 4:2016cv00663
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Fireproof LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Neal Technologies, Inc. v. FastLane Garage LLC
as 4:2016cv00642
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
FastLane Garage LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Neal Technologies, Inc. v. Maryland Performance Diesel LLC
as 4:2016cv00643
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Maryland Performance Diesel LLC and Craig A Briggs, Jr
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Buckholt v. Accel Recovery et al
as 3:2016cv00684
Plaintiff:
Jerry Buckholt
Defendant:
Accel Recovery , Assurance Diagnostic Labs , Michael O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Neal Technologies, Inc. v. Unique Motorsports, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00385
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Unique Motorsports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
