Intellectual Property Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01438
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Non-Infringement- Right to Compensation
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01391
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01370
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01346
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01158
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01107
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01025
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00879
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hodges v. Beo
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff: Michael P. Hodges
Defendant: Brittney Lynn Beo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?