Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Network Signatures Inc v. Staples Inc
as 8:2011cv01205
Plaintiff:
Network Signatures Inc
Defendant:
Staples Inc
Site Update Solutions LLC v. Accor North America Inc et al
as 4:2011cv03306
Plaintiff:
Site Update Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Adobe Systems Incorporated , Amazon.com Inc , Aweber Systems Inc and others
Mediator:
James W Knowles
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Site Update Solutions LLC v. Accor North America Inc et al
as 5:2011cv03306
Plaintiff:
Site Update Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Adobe Systems Incorporated , Amazon.com Inc , Aweber Systems Inc and others
Mediator:
James W Knowles
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Filer, Incorporated v. Staples, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04335
Defendant:
Does One through Ten and Staples, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Filer, Incorporated
Teleconference Systems LLC v. Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv05895
Plaintiff:
Teleconference Systems LLC, Teleconference Systems LLC and Teleconference Systems LLC
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Inc., Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Inc., HSBC USA Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Big Baboon Corporation v. Dell, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01198
Plaintiff:
Big Baboon Corporation, Big Baboon Corporation and Big Baboon Corporation
Defendant:
Dell, Inc., Dell Marketing Corp, Dell Gen P Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Accentra, Inc. et al v. Staples, Inc.
as 2:2007cv05862
Plaintiff:
Accentra, Inc., Accentra, Inc., Worktools, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Staples, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
dbest products Inc et al v. Staples Inc et al
as 2:2007cv04895
Plaintiff:
dbest products Inc and Richard Elden
Defendant:
Staples Inc, Staples The Office Superstore LLC and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
