Intellectual Property Cases
Grant Prideco, Inc. et al v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00730
Counter Defendant: Grant Prideco, Inc. and National Oilwell Varco, LP
Plaintiff: ReedHycalog UK, LTD. and ReedHycalog, LP
Counter Claimant: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Defendant: Smith International, Inc., Ulterra Drilling Technologies, L.P., Rockbit International Subsidiaries, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Smith International, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv01956
Plaintiff: Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.
Defendant: Smith International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Smith International, Inc. v. Baker Hughes Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00056
Plaintiff: Smith International, Inc.
Defendant: Baker Hughes Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Schlumber Technology et al v. Baker Hughes Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv03573
Defendant: Baker Hughes Inc.
Plaintiff: Schlumberger Technology Corp. , Smith International, Inc. and Specialised Petroleum Services Group Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Smith International, Inc. v. Ulterra Drilling Technologies, L.P.
as 4:2012cv00781
Plaintiff: Smith International, Inc.
Defendant: Ulterra Drilling Technologies, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Tex Pat, LLC v. Schlumberger Limited (Schlumberger NV) et al
as 5:2010cv00210
Plaintiff: Tex Pat, LLC
Defendant: Schlumberger Limited (Schlumberger NV), Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Smith International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whipstock Services, Inc. v. Smith International Inc
as 6:2009cv00114
Plaintiff: Whipstock Services, Inc.
Defendant: Smith International Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?