Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CIPM, LLC v. Stryker Corporation
as 8:2020cv02364
Plaintiff:
CIPM, LLC
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
North Bay Networks, Inc. et al v. STRYKER CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation
as 3:2020cv02748
Defendant:
STRYKER CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Panico and North Bay Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv06153
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Stryker Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
KFx Medical, LLC v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv01799
Plaintiff:
KFx Medical, LLC
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Surgical Irrigation Technologies Inc. v. Stryker Corporation
as 8:2015cv01623
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Plaintiff:
Surgical Irrigation Technologies Inc.
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00876
Plaintiff:
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Stryker Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gregg Klang v. D. Russell Pflueger et al
as 8:2013cv01971
Defendant:
Steven Bacich, Devonrex Inc, Pain Concepts Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gregg Klang
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. v. Stryker, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00355
Plaintiff:
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc., Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc., Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Stryker Communications, Inc., Stryker Communications, Inc., Stryker Communications, Inc. and others
Counter-claimant:
Stryker Corporation, Smith & Nephew, Inc., Smith & Nephew, Inc. and others
Counter-defendant:
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc., Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc., Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
