Cases 1 - 8 of 8
National Utility Service Inc v. Singularity Inc
as 4:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
National Utility Service Inc
Defendant:
Singularity Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
NATIONAL UTILITY SERVICE, INC. d/b/a NUS CONSULTING GROUP v. SINGULARITY, INC. d/b/a NATIONAL UTILITY CONSULTING
as 3:2018xc03139
Plaintiff:
National Utility Service Inc
Defendant:
Singularity Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
National Utility Service Inc v. Singularity Inc
as 3:2018cv03142
Plaintiff:
National Utility Service Inc
Defendant:
Singularity Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Utility Concierge LLC v. Utility Connect LLC et al
as 3:2013cv04618
Plaintiff:
Utility Concierge LLC
Defendant:
Utility Connect LLC and Nathaniel Steele
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Utility Composites, Inc. v. Direct Sales, Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv00936
Defendant:
Direct Sales, Ltd. and Jamie Sikorski
Plaintiff:
Utility Composites, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GT Venture Management AG et al v. Wallace et al
as 4:2011cv00137
Plaintiff:
GT Venture Management AG , Sacha H Spindler and Nationwide Utilities Corporation
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Kenneth Koepke
Defendant:
Brant Wallace and Michael D Massingill
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadbent & Associates, Inc. v. Lerin Hills Ltd. et al
as 5:2010cv00484
Counter Defendant:
Broadbent & Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Broadbent & Associates, Inc.
Counter Plaintiff:
J. Abel Godines, Lerin Development Company, L.L.C. and Lerin Hills Ltd.
Defendant:
J. Abel Godines, Jones & Carter, Inc., Lerin Development Company, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Utility Composites International Limited v. Kotoko Co., Ltd et al
as 2:2009cv00269
Plaintiff:
Utility Composites International Limited
Defendant:
Kotoko Co., Ltd, Marukyo USA, Shamrock Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
