Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Pearson Education, Inc. et al v. Dong et al
as 3:2022mc80186
Plaintiff:
Pearson Education, Inc., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Cengage Learning Inc. and others
Defendant:
Zhiming Dong agent of D/B/A LANPIN08 agent of D/B/A MING1015 and Xiaodong Zhang agent of D/B/A LANPIN08 agent of NICK ZHANG
Shaheryar Khan v. Adam Kraemer et al
as 2:2022cv02333
Plaintiff:
Shaheryar Khan
Defendant:
Adam Kraemer, Kent Seaton, Edward Charles Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Artifex Software, Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00665
Defendant:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Artifex Software, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Kunkel et al v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
as 3:2014cv03180
Plaintiff:
Dennis Kunkel , David Wrobel and John Cunningham
Defendant:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
as 3:2014cv03179
Defendant:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Cogent Medicine Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv04486
Plaintiff:
Cogent Medicine Inc.
Defendant:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Minden Pictures, Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
as 5:2013cv03246
Plaintiff:
Minden Pictures, Inc.
Defendant:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Clifton v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
as 5:2013cv02923
Plaintiff:
Carr Clifton
Defendant:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Minden Pictures, Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
as 3:2012cv04601
Plaintiff:
Minden Pictures, Inc.
Defendant:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Blaine ONeill v. John Wiley and Sons Inc et al
as 2:2011cv08193
Defendant:
Does and John Wiley and Sons Inc
Plaintiff:
Blaine ONeill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
