Cases 91 - 100 of 13,001
Colbert v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Allison M. Colbert
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Colbert v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Allison M. Colbert
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Goodell v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Anna Marie Goodell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Debi Jo Anderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kiser v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Kiser
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Foertsch v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cindy Foertsch
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Perkins v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jessica Diane Perkins
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bereckis v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Kim Bereckis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robertson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Damon Colter Robertson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moffett v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Casey D. Moffett
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
