Cases 101 - 110 of 247
HESTER v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00098
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
YVETTE HESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
MINOR v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv03577
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MINOR
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GHEE v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv03790
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
VERNITA CHARLENE GHEE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DAVIDS v. ANDREW SAUL COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv03571
Plaintiff:
KORY DAVIDS
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
COLEMAN v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv03581
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
LEQUESHA COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
WRIGHT v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv03364
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
DIANE WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PARISH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv03693
Plaintiff:
TAMMY ELIZABETHE PARISH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FIELDS v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv03320
Plaintiff:
PAMELA FIELDS
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ZAPATA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv03263
Plaintiff:
JUAN ZAPATA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
OXNER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv03066
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M. OXNER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
