Social Security Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 131 - 140 of 157
Wildermuth v. Astrue et al
as 1:2008cv01060
Plaintiff: Misty Dawn Wildermuth
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue, Michael B. Mukasey and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Farmer v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv02147
Appellant: Cora Kemp Farmer, Cora Kemp Farmer and Cora Kemp Farmer
Appellee: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jeter v. Astrue et al
as 1:2008cv01045
Plaintiff: Robert E. Jeter and Robert E. Jeter
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue, Michael Mukasey and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv02096
Petitioner: Stephanie Williams
Respondent: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dupree v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv02080
Plaintiff: Sherrie Dupree
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gray v. Astrue et al
as 1:2008cv01005
Plaintiff: Quatavious Diaz Gray
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue, Michael Mukasey and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lee v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv00003
Plaintiff: George W Lee
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Worthy v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv02809
Petitioner: Pamala Patrice Worthy, Pamala Patrice Worthy and Pamala Patrice Worthy
Respondent: Michael J. Astrue
Miscellaneou: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Lafoy v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01212
Plaintiff: Billy J. Lafoy, Billy J. Lafoy and Billy J. Lafoy
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue, David Kustoff and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reetz v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01211
Plaintiff: Joan M. Reetz
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue, David Kustoff and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?