Social Security Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 161 - 170 of 13,009
Martin v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04002
Plaintiff: Kade Martin
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Poe v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff: Jason Poe
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hancock v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: Jimmy L. Hancock
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sharrock v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05003
Plaintiff: Jaime E. Sharrock
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rainey v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: Rebecca Nicole Rainey
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tucker v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00017
Plaintiff: Robert Arthur Tucker
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dieckman v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: Laquita R. Dieckman
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wyrick v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff: Kimberly A Wyrick
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Brueggemann v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: Nancy Jean Brueggemann
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Theiss v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff: Myra J Theiss
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?