Cases 11 - 20 of 5,586
Orme v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn C. Orme
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wright v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
James Glenn Wright
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Wright
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
James Glenn Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Slack v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Rachel Slack
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Joyce Theresa Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ellis v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Shawntelle Ellis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sissoko v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Vivian Sissoko, o/b/o S.E.S, a minor
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eric Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Georgetta Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Andrews v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Sheila Andrews
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
