Cases 11 - 20 of 250
Wilder v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00842
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wilder
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Usher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Sonya Usher
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Walsh v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Philip Walsh
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Schnur v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Mia Schnur
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ewing v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Ewing
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fields v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Charitine Chante Fields
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nevels v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Miranda Nevels
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Munoz v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Lucas Munoz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ellis v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03171
Plaintiff:
David J Ellis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Raby v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Rebecca A Raby
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
