Cases 11 - 20 of 43
KAUCHER v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01643
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. KAUCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
ANDERSON v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01027
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOWELL v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv04990
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hagerman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Hagerman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Undetermined:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Danalds v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00233
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Robert Danalds
Undetermined:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Radas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv00236
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Radas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Frain v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Frain
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Higdon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Porter Higdon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Choate v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv00742
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lawton Choate
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCMILLAN v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv02990
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY B. MCMILLAN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
