Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Bessey v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00078
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kathy P. Bessey
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Flores v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00539
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Manuel P. Flores
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Peebles v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv00730
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Peebles
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Colvin
as 5:2016cv00474
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Phyllis P. Smith
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00590
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Phyllis P. Smith
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Walker v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2016cv00517
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Plaintiff:
Athena P. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Losoya v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00390
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Armando P. Losoya
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barge v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 5:2015cv00172
Plaintiff:
John P Barge
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Woods v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00212
Plaintiff:
Deeshazzar P Woods
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Woods v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
Deeshazzar P Woods
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
