Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Warsing v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00053
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Renee B. Warsing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Gray v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00029
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Gorden B. Gray
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McCready v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00059
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Eric B McCready
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Branham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marilyn B. Branham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ahern v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kevin O. Ahern
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Tim Heaphy, Michael B. Mukasey and SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Edwards v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00062
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Carlos Edwards
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Tim Heaphy, Michael B. Mukasey and SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mattichak v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00017
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Laurel B. Mattichak
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Henry v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
J. B. Henry, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blair v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv00112
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Sylvia B. Blair
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martin v. Barnhart
as 5:2010cv00102
Defendant:
Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Plaintiff:
Vanessa R. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
