Social Security Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01196
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Charles Christopher Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wujek v. Saul
as 1:2020cv02919
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Christopher Wujek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Miller v. Saul
as 1:2020cv02820
Plaintiff: Christopher Miller
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
McCall v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02389
Plaintiff: Christopher McCall
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lombardo v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00158
Plaintiff: Christopher A. Lombardo
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
McClurge v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv08394
Plaintiff: Christopher McClurge
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Guzowski v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv05046
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff: Christopher M. Guzowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hamilton v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01192
Plaintiff: Christopher Hamilton
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Goossens v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02060
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff: Christopher G. Goossens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Pender v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00081
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Christopher Dean Pender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?