Social Security Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 106
MARCHESE v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00244
LATHAM v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv00710
Plaintiff: JOHN ANTHONY LATHAM, JR.
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WOLF v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00295
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECUIRTY and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: SEAN ANTHONY WOLF
CHIMENTO v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00945
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: CARMEN ANTHONY CHIMENTO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Springer v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv01080
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Springer
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BULLOCK v. BERRY et al
as 2:2019cv02303
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: ANTHONY BULLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOWARD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv02262
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: ANTHONY HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Fasulo v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00874
Plaintiff: Anthony Fasulo
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DAVIS v. BERRYHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv05400
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: ANTHONY B. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MANDES v. BERRYHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03225
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MANDES
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: NANCY BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?