Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Stephens v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv00163
Plaintiff:
Virginia B. Stephens
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fuller v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2008cv00261
Plaintiff:
Clarence B. Fuller
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Poindexter v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
Virginia B. Poindexter
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv02158
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Dorothy B. Gillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2007cv02031
Plaintiff:
Rodrickus B. Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Todd v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2007cv01775
Plaintiff:
Carol B Todd
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Buckhalt v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv00845
Plaintiff:
Jerry B. Buckhalt
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 5:2007cv01549
Plaintiff:
Melissa B. Taylor and Melissa B. Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Griffin v. Astrue
as 3:2007cv00730
Plaintiff:
Mary B. Griffin
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stanley v. Astrue
as 4:2007cv01217
Plaintiff:
Steven B. Stanley
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
