Cases 51 - 60 of 100
White v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
as 3:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Kristy E White
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nevils v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Gene E. Nevils
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nelson v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Nelson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Light v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2011cv00618
Plaintiff:
Ralph E Light
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Yoakley v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2011cv00383
Plaintiff:
Robert E Yoakley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of et al
as 4:2011cv00063
Plaintiff:
Bobby E Robinson, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Graham v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2011cv00526
Plaintiff:
Vickie E. Graham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2011cv00251
Plaintiff:
Homer E King
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shelton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
James E Shelton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roy v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2011cv00151
Plaintiff:
Denise E Roy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.