Social Security Cases filed in Texas
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,319
Keller v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01221
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Velma Marie Keller
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Isabel Arana v. Carolyn W. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv03193
Plaintiff: Isabel Arana
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Davis v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv03356
Plaintiff: Roland Davis
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Bartlett v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv01292
Plaintiff: Kelly Bartlett
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Lara v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv00062
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff: Diana S Lara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pavliska v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv03324
Plaintiff: Jerry Pavliska
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Brodie v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00479
Plaintiff: Patricia A. Brodie
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Flowers v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2016cv00135
Plaintiff: Clarence J Flowers
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Collins v. Colvin
as 5:2016cv01113
Plaintiff: Tammy Marie Collins
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crow v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01237
Plaintiff: Amanda L Crow
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?