Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00324
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eric Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Eric Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00538
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eric Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Norris v. Saul
as 7:2020cv00202
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Eric Robert Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gautreau v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00081
Plaintiff:
Eric Matthew Gautreau
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Propst v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00089
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Timothy J. Heaphy, US Atty Gen Eric H. Holder, Jr. and SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Angela S. Propst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roberts v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00013
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Roberts
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brown v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00312
Plaintiff:
Dwight Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue , Eric Holder, Jr. , Neil H. MacBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Meadows v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00108
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Tim Heaphy, U.S. Attorney Genera Eric H. Holder, Jr. and SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Preston Meadows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McCready v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00059
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Eric B McCready
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
