Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Truman v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Ari N. Truman
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rigffe v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Amber N. Rigffe
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Detwiler v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ashley N. Detwiler
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Meade v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Chasity N. Meade
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Yates v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Shauna N Yates
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Simmons v. Commissioner
as 7:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
Tasha N. Simmons
Defendant:
Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Ashley N. Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cyngier v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Natalia N. Cyngier
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ashton N. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dunham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2020cv00159
Plaintiff:
Kimberly N. Dunham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
