Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Adams v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Melissa Kay Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jaramillo v. Commissioner Social Security
as 1:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Adam Jamamillo and Adam Jaramillo
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FILING ERROR
as 1:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Adam Jaramillo
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2017cv03673
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv00484
Plaintiff:
Claude J. Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. Meyer
as 4:2017cv02572
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Adams
Defendant:
Gerald Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Adams v. Colvin
as 5:2016cv01055
Plaintiff:
Michelle Adams
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2016cv00336
Petitioner:
Stephen Decedric Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adams v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00893
Plaintiff:
Linda A. Adams
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Adams v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00311
Plaintiff:
Russell Allen Adams
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
