Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Montoya v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Albert Montoya
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Padilla v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv03787
Plaintiff:
Albert Padilla
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Domingue v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv01164
Plaintiff:
Albert Domingue
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Esparza v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv01253
Plaintiff:
Albert Esparza
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Hope v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00487
Plaintiff:
Albert W Hope
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Alexander v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv02988
Plaintiff:
Albert Alexander
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Flores v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv00736
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Flores, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pampell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00953
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Albert Pampell
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Navarro v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00416
Plaintiff:
Loyd Albert Navarro
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cortez v. Colvin
as 5:2013cv00508
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Albert Cortez
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
