Cases 1 - 10 of 12
NELSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
BETTY J. NELSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
DAFFRON v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01711
Plaintiff:
BETTY C. DAFFRON
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jarvis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00142
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Thomas L Kirsch, William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Betty Jarvis and Betty Jean Jarvis
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00421
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Undetermined:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HAMPTON v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01121
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
BETTY S. HAMPTON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
MARTIN v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00325
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
BETTY JOANNE MARTIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Gilbert v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Betty L Gilbert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GROOVER v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00065
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
BETTY GROOVER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BENTZLER v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01652
Plaintiff:
BETTY BENTZLER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TAYLOR v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00162
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
BETTY A. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
