Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Jones v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03180
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv01416
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Martikelia Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00954
Plaintiff:
Lovetta Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Brian E Jones and Brian E. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Robbyne Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv04154
Plaintiff:
Warren S. Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv00728
Plaintiff:
Karissa Jewell Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
