Cases 1 - 10 of 47
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jane Randolph
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Randolph v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05318
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jane Randolph
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bowman v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05096
Plaintiff:
Pamela Bowman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03087
Plaintiff:
Pamela G Lewis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ketchen v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05074
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ann Ketchen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Archambault v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Pamela Archambault
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stephenson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03063
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lynn Stephenson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nollen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05229
Plaintiff:
Pamela Nollen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moore v. Saul
as 1:2021cv03030
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Pamela A Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ketchen v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03214
Plaintiff:
Pamela A Ketchen
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
