Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Anderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
TOLLE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01442
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY TOLLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FINNEY v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv02260
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARIE FINNEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00023
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Hughes
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv00268
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Hernandez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOWARD v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00856
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY J. HOWARD
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CLARK v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARIE CLARK
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bonilla v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2009cv00153
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Bonilla
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2007cv00258
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
