Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SIMPSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00583
Plaintiff:
SHAWN B. SIMPSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hartley-Simpson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Scharline F. Hartley-Simpson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CLERVRAIN et al v. KIJAKAZI et al
as 1:2021cv03036
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN, ROODE A. CLERVRAIN, SHAMEEL CLERVRAIN and others
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, DAN RUSYNIAK, MICHAEL GARGANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SIMPSON v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01582
Plaintiff:
DOUG JAMES SIMPSON and DOUGLAS JAMES SIMPSON
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SIMPSON v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv00214
Plaintiff:
SHAWN B. SIMPSON
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SIMPSON v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00328
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA R. SIMPSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SIMPSON v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv02009
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
MARLETA SIMPSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SIMPSON v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01069
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff:
AMANDA L. SIMPSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
SIMPSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00962
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
AMANDA L. SIMPSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SIMPSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00163
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
SHERI L. SIMPSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
