Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Smith v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eric Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Linda L Smith
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Susan C Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Kijakazi et al
as 3:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Secret Selena Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Zabrina Fowler and Noel Smith
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Angela A. Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R. Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Smith v. Saul
as 7:2021cv00360
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00150
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tonya Shirelle Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Saul et al
as 3:2021cv00086
Plaintiff:
Arlinda M Smith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Smith v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Melissa Smith and J.A.M.
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
